Review form


Forestry Letters, ISSN: 0079-4708,

Name of the Reviewer:  
Institution of the Reviewer:
Date of the Review:  
Title of the Article:

Please send this review to
Instructions to Reviewers:

Thank you for agreeing to review this article. All articles submitted to Forestry Letters are subject to double-blind peer review and we ask that reviewers respect the confidentiality of the review process. Please answer the following questions using the scale provided. Please insert a numeric rating on a 4-point scale for each question and add comments below questions. Please write your review politely.

1 poor
2 acceptable but needs improvements
3 good
4 very good

1. Is the title appropriate? []
2. Is the abstract accurately reflects the content? []
3. Is the purpose of the article stated clearly? []
4. Are the study methods clearly explained? []
5. Are all tables and figures clear and necessary? []
6. Are the results clearly described? []
7. Are the conclusions or summary accurate and supported by the contentt? []
8. Is the article correctly written (in terms of grammar and style)? []
9. Is the literature used sufficiently comprehensive and current? []
10. Are the references correctly indicated in the article? []

Comments and Suggestions

Reviewer Recommendation
Please indicate which of the following actions you recommend (set Yes into parenthesis).

Publish, no significant changes suggested. []
Publish, but with the suggested changes to the article . []
Reject, but encourage the author to revise and resubmite the article. []
Reject, do not encourage to resubmission. []

Forestry Letters  eISSN 2450-4920

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. If you would like to change your preferences you may do so by following the instructions here